In a recent op-ed, Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian calls for the elimination of government subsidies across all energy sectors, arguing that market forces should determine energy viability without taxpayer-funded support.
In a recent op-ed published on February 25, 2025, Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian expressed strong opposition to government subsidies for energy production, advocating for a free-market approach where energy technologies must stand on their own merit without taxpayer-funded support. Christian’s stance challenges the prevailing practice of subsidizing various energy sectors, including both traditional fossil fuels and renewable energy sources.
Critique of Subsidies Across Energy Sectors
Christian’s critique extends to all forms of energy subsidies, emphasizing that government financial support distorts market dynamics, fosters dependency, and leads to inefficient use of taxpayer dollars. He argues that if an energy technology is truly viable, it should not require subsidies; conversely, if it needs subsidies, it may not be economically sustainable. This perspective aligns with a broader debate on the role of government in energy markets and the potential benefits of removing financial support for energy production.
The Petra Nova Example
To illustrate his point, Christian references the Petra Nova carbon capture project in Texas. Initially launched with significant government backing, Petra Nova ceased operations in 2020 due to economic challenges. The project was later revived in 2022, coinciding with increased federal funding for carbon capture initiatives. Christian questions the sustainability of such projects that rely on continuous government support, suggesting that their viability should be assessed based on market conditions rather than ongoing subsidies.
Advocacy for a Level Playing Field
Christian advocates for a level playing field in the energy sector, where all energy sources compete without government intervention. He contends that major oil and gas companies should focus on promoting free-market principles rather than seeking subsidies or engaging in political debates over energy policy. By eliminating subsidies, Christian believes that energy would become more affordable, cleaner, and more reliable for consumers.
Addressing Carbon Emissions and Market Realities
While acknowledging concerns about carbon emissions, Christian points to the 16% reduction in U.S. CO₂ emissions over the past two decades as evidence of progress without the need for additional subsidies. He also notes that U.S. oil production is 23% cleaner than the global average, suggesting that market-driven improvements are already contributing to environmental goals. Christian questions the efficacy of further subsidies, especially when other major emitters, such as China, continue to increase their emissions without similar financial support.
Conclusion
Christian concludes by urging the energy industry to advocate for the elimination of all subsidies, regardless of the energy source. He believes that such a move would lead to a more efficient and competitive energy market, ultimately benefiting consumers and the economy. His op-ed contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of government in energy markets and the future of energy policy in the United States.